Showing posts with label publishing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label publishing. Show all posts

Monday, 19 September 2011

Monetising Digital Platforms & Rights

I went to an excellent 1/2 day session on Monetising Digital Platforms & Rights on Wednesday at Vision & Media. The day was led by two top flight guys in this sector, Justin Judd - director of i-Rights Ltd and formerly ran Granada TV's digital division and Peter Cowley from Spirit Digital Media, who I heard at the Nations & Regions Media conference earlier this year.

These are some notes of things discussed that appealed to me. But it is by no means an accurate record of everything that was discussed!

I Pay, You Pay, Some else Pays
We looked at these 3 business models.
The I Pay obviously isn't a viable long term business model as putting your own money into a business for ever will end up in certain failure, but it may be necessary to get a business going.
You Pay - is where the consumer pays you for a product or service, in this context subscription models are a good example.
Someone else Pays - this is usually some form of sponsorship or advertising funded model which usually means the product or servie is free at the point of use.

The best model is probably the I Pay turning into You Pay. The problem with the Someone else Pays is that to get advertising funding you need proven scale before advertisers will support your product and as a new start up proven scale is hard to come by!

Scarcity is important
You can't make money from anything that is easily available. The music industry has learnt this the hard way and now puts the product out  but makes money from the live experience where they can control the scarcity factor. The news industry is in the process of learning this. A number of newspapers have put most of their content behind a pay wall. The FT may be able to make it stick because they have a niche market in financial related news, but The Times is going to find it harder. The Guardian is producing excellent free content but it still isn't clear how they will make money. The Daily Mail is making a go of the Someone else Pays model by producing news people want,  like celebrity news and gossip, which drives traffic to their site and they get a income form the advertising they can sell on their site because they have 'proven scale'. So simply put don't try and monetise a product which isn't scarce.

You need to understand the digital world.
This includes the scarcity issue because it is largely the digital world that has made things like music and news freely available but also the digital world has produced new routes to the market place. We were given the example of John Locke who was able to publish his book direct to the market without a conventional publisher by producing a digital version of his book using Amazon's Kindle platform and Amazon's site. He sold 1 million copies in 5 months priced at 99 cents, even based on the Amazon business model he still cleared just over 1/3 million dollars, he now has many more titles and has even written a book on how he did it, but remember no publisher, no marketing, but he will have got a major free publicity push from being an early adopter which is another thing you need to understand about the digital world. Being an early adopter brings you scarcity.


So if you can bypass the big guys and get your product or service direct to market and avoid the middle men you can make a good return. Now harness some key middle guys like Amazon or Apple and you can really make some money but you still need a good product!

Strictly Sexual was another example. It was a movie made for $100,000 and distributed through Hulu in the US, so no DVD or broadcast release, direct on line and then have cleared $200,000 already. But again it had to be a good product, with a good story, clever plot and title angle etc and despite the title isn't a porn movie. I haven't seen it because unfortunately Hulu is only available in the US . It is geo-blocked elsewhere just as our iPlayer service is blocked outside the UK.

Facebook Games
Games on Facebook is another example of making money in the digital world and often use the Freemium model. The game is free to download and use, but the free version runs slowly. So you can buy add ons that make the game run  faster and also buy add ons that help you play it. A typical example was one of the more popular games which has been downloaded 7.5 million time. If only 1% buy anything, a typical pickup ratio fror the freemium model, then then 750,000 people pay $5 brings you in a lot of money, to carry on supporting that 99% of your market doesn't pay for. Again it is much easier for the early adopters to make money.

Apps
We were shown some examples of the iTunes App chart and it was interesting to note that there were a number of audio related Apps doing very well in the chart, like Keith Lemon's Mouthboard and also an app called Fonejacker which is an app based on the radio spoof prank phone call model, but people are paying good money to listen to prank phone calls.

The ABCD of media revenue options
A for Advertising - a 'some else pays' model
B for Broadcasting revenues - the traditional broadcaster conmmisions and pays for you to produce a product but you probably won't retain all the rights to. Again 'some one else pays' either through the license fee or advertising revenue.
C for Consumer - this is the 'you pay' model, and includes services that are funded using the subscription model like Sky. One interesting fact is that in the TV world the value of Subscription TV worldwide far out values the value of advert funded TV. So the 'you pay' model is the way to go.
D for Data - this is becoming a fourth business model where you can provide a product free at the point of use but the data you collect has value which you can monetise. The new buzz phrase is 'Data is the new Oil'. This can include data like email addresses, Facebook likes and Twitter followers.

It was interesting that in the discussion of projects people were looking at, Justin & Peter were strongly recommending that a Mountain Sports Film Festival didn't set up and expensive web site to promote and sell the films that were presented at the festival. They were suggesting they use the data to make money.




Thursday, 9 December 2010

Thoughts on 'Free' by Chris Anderson

I have read this book as part of my research for the programme I am taking part in, called Radio Revisited. You can read some more about the reasons for this and what Radio Revisited aims to do on the Vision and Media blog.

There is no doubt that the work is changing and the reduction of digital storage and delivery to an almost un-metered price means a change in what can be charged for and what will become 'free'. Chris Anderson in his previous book The Long Tail showed how cheaper and cheaper digital storage means digital stores can hold a huge inventory and still make money from selling just a couple of units from their many lines.

Atoms v bits
Now in Free, Chris compares anything that is made of 'atoms' as something that has value and can be traded for real money and anything that is made up of 'bits' is perceived as not worth spending money on.  But my problem is that anything I make, as a sound designer, is in 'bits' and so how do I make a living in this 'atoms v bits' world? What I have is intellectual property (IP). So my challenge is to monetize my IP and how to go about making money around 'free'?

Anderson outlines that to compete with 'free' you have to produce something better, or at least different from the 'free' alternatives and quotes examples like people passing the free office coffee machine to go to Starbucks to buy a coffee there. Or in the digital world he compares Microsoft Office with the open source 'office' equivalents, where if you want a relatively reliable product with customer service you buy Microsoft. If you want a 'free' product and can put up with it not being as reliable and can spend the time hunting on the net for the fix, then the open source option offers a low cost solution. Also if what you are doing is being replaced by software and/or 'on line', like travel agents, real estate agents, or stockbrokers then you need to move upstream to use your IP to resolve the more complex problems which people will still pay for.

Journalism
The newspaper industry is being decimated in this 'information free' world. So journalists need to adapt to survive. The top tier newspapers will survive but most journalists aren't employed by them. They work in the 101 magazines and trade journals, local papers etc. The journalists that are prepared to adapt will need to move upstream and become editors and gatekeepers of the information overloaded world of the internet. They also need to become coaches and editors to the growing amateur journalists, bloggers etc.

So it is looking as if the phrase 'time is money' is looking less and less secure....

If you are interested in buying the book then please consider using the links below.


Tuesday, 30 November 2010

When is the best time to post on social media?

Erik Qualman at the Socialnomics blog has posted this video from @equalman about the best times to post content on social media and the graveyard slots to avoid.




General guidelines:

  • Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday are your best days
  • Saturday is the worst day
  • Holidays are slow traffic days (except commerce sites)
  • 10 am – 11:30 am and 1 – 3:30 pm are great times to post
  • Stagger posts based on time zones
A recent study by Virtue specific to Facebook also shows that Social Media may follow similar patterns to the rest of the traditional Web.
  • The three biggest usage spikes tend to occur on weekdays at 11:00 a.m., 3:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. ET.
  • The biggest spike occurs at 3:00 p.m. ET on weekdays.
  • Weekday usage is pretty steady, however Wednesday at 3:00 pm ET is consistently the busiest period.


Fans are less active on Sunday compared to all other days of the week; most sites slowest traffic day is Saturday, followed by Sunday. This is interesting since so many schools and companies block Facebook from 9 – 5 pm.  Tough to block mobile devices though.






There are exceptions to the above rules, depending on what you are posting, but these are good general guides for most sites, social media activity and blogs. Erik has been fortunate to have access to statistics to hundreds of different sites/blogs during my sixteen year career and roughly 90% of the time the above holds true.
When he was the Head of Marketing at Travelzoo his production team always sent out the Top 20 e-mail list to the 21 million subscribers on Wednesday at roughly 11 am.  Why?  This gave it the best chance to be read.  If you have an incredible Tweet you need to get out, but it’s 2 a.m. on a Saturday, use a tool like hootsuite to schedule for the tweet to go out when more potential readers might read it.
Ironically, this post may not be picked up as much as it could since I’m posting it in the afternoon on a Monday following a holiday.
Ric suggests these as other good posts on this topic: YouTube Traffic PattersBest Time to Send E-Mail, When are Facebook Users Most Active?Conversion Volume by Day

Tuesday, 19 October 2010

Multi-Station Radioplayer to launch in December

The Multi-station platform Radioplayer is to be rolled out from December, launching with 50 stations, the chairman of the project has announced. Speaking at the Radio Festival in Salford, Andrew Harrison – chief executive of RadioCentre – revealed the “full consumer launch” of the online service would take place in February, with at least 200 stations including all BBC channels and Ofcom-regulated networks.

Michael Hill, Radioplayer’s managing director, demonstrated a test set for delegates.  He described it as “a defining moment for UK radio”, adding: “We hope all broadcast stations, of all sizes and types, will participate.”

Listen to Michael Hill talk about it to Mark Rock CEO of AudioBoo on AudioBoo...

Listen!

Tim Davie, director of BBC Audio and Music, added: “It is a result of genuine collaboration across the industry and is the sort of innovation we need to make digital radio a reality.”

Tuesday, 13 July 2010

More on social media trends - is blogging the future for publishing?

Jeff Bullas has posted this question on his blog. He writes....

Blogging is publishing, it is content, and that can be a video, images, text or all of these. Blogging is about niches and  allows those that are passionate about their interests to start publishing and sharing online and through promotion drive traffic, eyeballs and then revenue.

Sure, the big blogs he refers to are going to be succesful like  The Huffington Post with 37.6 Million hits for the month of March, 2010. Other big sites are

  • Mashable – 5.16 Million views (Technology Blog)
  • Nymag.com -  3.4 million views (Entertainment Blog)
  • BoingBoing.com – 3.1 Million views (Cultural curiosities and interesting technologies Blog)
  • Businessinsider.com – 2.8 Million views (Business Blog)
  • Inhabitat.com – 656,000 views (Environmental Blog)
 for the same period. But it is some of the comments that are almost more interesting than the post itself like this from Jean Sarauer...


I definitely think blogging is the future of publishing. As a writer, I’m seeing print markets shrink and fold all the time now, and some excellent writers are skipping that whole route and going straight into blogging. And why not? No editor to cramp your style, immediate publication, direct interaction with readers, and the ability to create your own products. I don’t see this going away anytime soon.

and then this from Crosbie Fitch

Yup, blogging is the future. It’s journalists publishing their intellectual work directly to their readers – missing out the publisher, no longer needing to charge the reader for printing, distribution, retail.

But my question is in all this freeing up how does the writer get paid? How are they going to monetise their blogs to get a reasonable income?